Testimonial.to is built for video testimonials. Shoutjar is built for turning reviews into social content. Different tools, different strengths.
7-day free trial • No credit card required
Different tools optimized for different workflows. Choose based on your primary need.
| Feature | Testimonial.to | Shoutjar |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $20/mo | €15/mo |
| Video testimonials | ✅ Advanced | ✅ Basic |
| Text testimonials | ||
| Video recording/editing | ✅ Strong | |
| Import from review sites | Limited | ✅ 6 platforms |
| Auto-discovery social | ✅ 7 platforms | |
| Generate social posts | ||
| Generate quote images | Basic | ✅ Multiple |
| AI content generation | ||
| Widget embed | ||
| Wall of Love | ||
| AI sentiment analysis | ||
| Competitor tracking |
Both tools are excellent—they just solve different problems.
COLLECT → RECORD → DISPLAY
Testimonial.to is optimized for VIDEO testimonials:
Best for:
Companies that want polished video testimonials as their primary social proof format.
The output: Beautiful videos on your website.
COLLECT → DISCOVER → AMPLIFY
Shoutjar is optimized for CONTENT DISTRIBUTION:
Best for:
Companies that want testimonials working across social media, not just sitting on a website.
The output: Social content that drives traffic everywhere.
Ask yourself:
"Do I need better VIDEO RECORDING for testimonials?"
→ Testimonial.to is probably better
"Do I need my REVIEWS turned into SOCIAL CONTENT?"
→ Shoutjar is probably better
"Do I need BOTH?"
→ You might need both tools, or Shoutjar + a video tool like Loom
Most indie makers and SaaS founders have more text reviews than video testimonials. If that's you, Shoutjar gives you more leverage from what you already have.
If video testimonials are your primary strategy, Testimonial.to is a strong choice.
Testimonial.to has a polished in-browser recording experience. Customers click a link and record. No app needed. Shoutjar doesn't have this—if video recording is critical, Testimonial.to is better.
Basic editing tools built in. Trim clips, add branding. Shoutjar doesn't offer video editing.
Their widgets are optimized for video display. If your testimonial strategy is video-heavy, their widgets are purpose-built.
The entire product is designed around "get video from customers." If that's your #1 goal, Testimonial.to is more focused.
We're not trying to convince you otherwise. If video testimonials are your primary strategy, Testimonial.to is a strong choice.
Find mentions across Twitter, LinkedIn, Reddit, Product Hunt, Hacker News, Instagram, YouTube. Testimonial.to doesn't monitor social platforms for you.
Turn any review into Twitter posts, LinkedIn posts, and quote images. One click, multiple variants, ready to post. Testimonial.to doesn't generate social content.
Import from G2, Trustpilot, Capterra, Yelp, App Store, Google Play. Testimonial.to has limited import options—it's focused on collecting new testimonials, not leveraging existing ones.
Sentiment analysis, quality scoring, fake detection, auto-translation. Understand which reviews deserve amplification.
Monitor what people say about competitors. Find opportunities. Testimonial.to doesn't offer this.
Shoutjar starts at €15/mo. Testimonial.to starts at $20/mo.
Amplify: Your reviews → Social content
"We switched from Testimonial.to because we had plenty of text reviews but no way to use them on social media. Shoutjar solved that."
Rachel Kim
Founder, Metrics.so
Source: G2
With Testimonial.to: This G2 review stays on G2.
With Shoutjar: It becomes content across every channel.
"We had plenty of text reviews but no way to use them on social media. Shoutjar solved that." — @rachelkim 🙌
Social proof sitting unused? Same problem we had. Here's what helped 👇
Had to share this feedback from Rachel at Metrics.so: "We had plenty of text reviews but no way to use them on social media." This is exactly the problem Shoutjar solves 💙
"Shoutjar solved that."
— Rachel Kim, Founder @ Metrics.so
Better choice: Testimonial.to
Why: Purpose-built for video collection and display. Better recording experience.
Better choice: Shoutjar
Why: Import existing reviews and amplify them into social content immediately.
Better choice: Shoutjar
Why: Auto-discovery monitors 7 social platforms. Testimonial.to doesn't do this.
Better choice: Shoutjar
Why: Amplify generates Twitter/LinkedIn posts and images. Testimonial.to only displays.
Better choice: Testimonial.to
Why: Deeper video features, better recording flow, video-optimized widgets.
Better choice: Shoutjar
Why: Amplify automates content generation. One click, multiple ready-to-post variants.
Free
Premium
$20/mo
Agency
$50/mo
Trial
Launch
€15/mo
Scale
€49/mo
Shoutjar is cheaper and includes features Testimonial.to doesn't offer (auto-discovery, amplify, AI insights). But if video recording is essential, Testimonial.to's premium video features may be worth the extra cost.
Some teams use both:
This makes sense if:
For most indie makers and small SaaS teams, one tool is enough. Choose based on your primary need:
Video-first → Testimonial.to
Amplification-first → Shoutjar
If you have text testimonials in Testimonial.to:
Note: Video testimonials from Testimonial.to won't transfer directly—they're hosted on their platform. You can keep Testimonial.to for videos while using Shoutjar for text amplification.
Need help? Email support@shoutjar.com
Start Free TrialNo. Testimonial.to is excellent for video testimonials. If video is your primary strategy, it's a great tool. Shoutjar is better for turning text reviews into social content.
Different tools for different needs. See if Shoutjar fits yours.
Start Free Trial7 days free • No credit card • Cancel anytime